Belief attracts a similar belief and so on, to form a simulated world to believe in.
It is the nature of believers in a simulated world to believe their world is the only real world—
thus the left believes the right is wrong and the right believes the right is right.
All belief is based upon the knowledge of a simulated world, but the only true knowledge is being—
and even being isn’t absolute.
I am divided into observer and observed, one and zero, right and wrong, peace and war—
yet there’s only this observing. Does the observer intuitively know it’s actually false,
and thus bolsters itself with other observers in a truce of collective observers observing, or believing?
So the observer-believing is the so-called known substitute—for being-observing the unknown?
No comments:
Post a Comment